Saturday, June 8, 2013

Kings and Queens of England: Episode 1: Normans


Kings and Queens of England: Episode 1: Normans


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PfoYkgoBZQ





     Kings and Queens of England: Episode 1: Normans

AngelDocs AngelDocs·29 videos
2,333
41,425
Like     Dislike 7
Published on Nov 11, 2012
This programme studies the Normans, covering historical landmarks such as the Battle of Hastings,the creation of the exchequer,Thomas Becket's murder,the Crusades and the signing of the Magna Carta.

All Comments (89)

Joey Arnold
  • hmcccpp
    HAHAHAHHAHHAHHAHAHHHHAHAHHHHAa­re you serious?? hahhaahhahhah ooooooooooo man you rule !!!!
  • hmcccpp
    "if the first norman was called norman so they called themselfs normans" o man hahahahahahahahaah i never laught so much ;that guy must be an american ;??!!
    · in reply to MacX1985 (Show the comment)
  • TheLoyalOfficer
    Don't feel dumb.  Grab a book and catch up. You can do it. You'll learn faster than you think with a modicum of effort. That's how I did it - self taught for the most part - at least for this period.
    · in reply to Nikanaiko (Show the comment)
  • ted carter
    Sorry, I've gotta jump in. Do u know how confusing history is to people like nika and me? I'm in the medical prof. Do u understand 'renal function', LVF or CCF? Do u understand how to take a history from someone with jaundice? Look up MRSI or CAT scanS (in a book) then tell ME how they work. I know the left side of the heart is supplied by the oxygenated blood from the lungs, the right side is supplied by the inferior and superior vena cavas. History. I haven't a fucking clue. 
  • ted carter
    Simple questions: who the hell was norman, what was his surname? 
  • TheLoyalOfficer
    Yes but history is different. It's universal to us all. Start off by trying to picture yourself in the shoes, sandals, boots or bare feet of the person you are studying. What would you have done differently? How would you have reacted? Gain a broad, surface knowledge first, and then dive deep on the areas that fascinate you the most. Soon, those stovepipes start to close into each other and great understanding can be attained.
    Just put the time in. You'll even enjoy it, I bet.
  • ted carter
    If Norman took his name from Normandy in France and his subject followed suit: calling themselves Normans, did Elizabeth take her name from somewhere called Elizabeth in Engalnd and her subjects did the same: by calling themselves Elizabethan? If so, can Elizabeth still be found on maps of today? I know King James knocked a few places down because of religion. I watched Time Team last week (first time). Very interesting. Has anyone noticed that scruffy, bald-guy was Baldrick in Blackadder.
    ·
  • ted carter
    i don't know why i got involved in this, i don't like history and norman's a bloody stupid name if u ask me..i just wondered if the first norman was called norman so they called themselves normans..one group of nutters called themselves davidians after someone called david..i believe...
    ·
  • hmcccpp
    hahahahahahaha you must be an american,right?!hahahhahahah
  • TheLoyalOfficer
    Don't feel dumb. Grab a book and catch up. You can do it. You'll learn faster than you think with a modicum of effort. That's how I did it - self taught for the most part - at least for this period.
    · in reply to Nikanaiko (Show the comment)
  • ted carter
    Sorry, I've gotta jump in. Do u know how confusing history is to people like nika and me? I'm in the medical prof. Do u understand 'renal function', LVF or CCF? Do u understand how to take a history from someone with jaundice? Look up MRSI or CAT scanS (in a book) then tell ME how they work. I know the left side of the heart is supplied by the oxygenated blood from the lungs, the right side is supplied by the inferior and superior vena cavas. History. I haven't a fucking clue.
  • ted carter
    Simple questions: who the hell was norman, what was his surname?
  • TheLoyalOfficer
    Yes but history is different. It's universal to us all. Start off by trying to picture yourself in the shoes, sandals, boots or bare feet of the person you are studying. What would you have done differently? How would you have reacted? Gain a broad, surface knowledge first, and then dive deep on the areas that fascinate you the most. Soon, those stovepipes start to close into each other and great understanding can be attained.
    Just put the time in. You'll even enjoy it, I bet.
  • ted carter
    If Norman took his name from Normandy in France and his subject followed suit: calling themselves Normans, did Elizabeth take her name from somewhere called Elizabeth in Engalnd and her subjects did the same: by calling themselves Elizabethan? If so, can Elizabeth still be found on maps of today? I know King James knocked a few places down because of religion. I watched Time Team last week (first time). Very interesting. Has anyone noticed that scruffy, bald-guy was Baldrick in Blackadder. 
    ·
  • ted carter
    i don't know why i got involved in this, i don't like history and norman's a bloody stupid name if u ask me..i just wondered if the first norman was called norman so they called themselves normans..one group of nutters called themselves davidians after someone called david..i believe...
    ·
  • MacX1985
    Lol, no. Other way around. Norman means Northmen, men from the north, aka Scandinavians. Normandy was named after them.
  • ted carter
    even more confused...is it like teddy boys//? e.g was the first teddy boy called teddy? we don't say 'i come from the norman of england , do we.
    · in reply to MacX1985 (Show the comment)
  • MacX1985
    Now you're confusing me :P I was just stating where the name "Norman" and "Normandy" originated from. It were Skandinavian Vikings capturing this region from France... In 1066 when Normans from Normandy set sail to England they were already speaking French for quite some time.
  • TheKnowledgeofall
    saladin was the real lionheart..richard slaughtered the harmless
    ·
  • mausalus09
    The first conquerors of The United Kingdom after Romans were always from France or Germany, pushing the Natives back. Im an American and even we are taught the truth about our English "cousins".
    ·
  • Arthas Menethil
    Normans, Frenchified twats.
    ·
  • fraOppland
    I am an American. I know plenty about English history. I about the Picts, the Roman occupation of Britain. The Angles, the Jutes and the Saxons. I know English as a languages at its roots is a Western Germanic language, most closely related to Friesan, another Western Germanic peoples. I know that the modern island of England was once part of mainland Europe before the last great ice age created the English Channel and the the island of Britain. Your blanket generalities do you a disservice.
  • fraOppland
    And I too am a Young, my ancestors were most likely Scots-Irish. It isn't just your history but all English-Britain-Irish-Scots-Vi­kings whether they be Danes, Norwegians, Normans, whether they be Germans of Angles, Jutes or Saxons. Whether they be Picts or the Gauls or Gallic people where a Celtic people who spoke Celtic and lived in Gaul, the region corresponding to what is now France, Belgium, Switzerland, the parts of the Netherlands and Germany. The fact is Britain is the world's history.
  • Steven Young
    We, the Youngs, are Normans in descent :D
  • Steven Young
    Sorry for basing my analytical statements on graphs and surveys done on Americans. Clearly, you are one of the rare Americans who actually enjoy history of Britain, but by Americans I meant those who actually were not self-educated or has graduated in any sort of History (like I believe you have). By what I said, I was defining the American school system, which focuses more on the topics I previously discussed.
  • CassieLopez
    Comment removed
  • MsFelixtheCat50
    Americans just tend not to go into specifics, if you asked an American student about British kings...well they would scratch their heads. Even Western Civilization doesn't really go into much detail. Our education tends to be very broad and concerns majors historical themes rather than specific things. I'm sure there's a lot that students are missing out on
  • MsFelixtheCat50
    No way, that's not true at all. Although...I did not go to public schools, so I can't say definitively. I personally started history with ancient Rome and Greece and worked up to Medieval Europe, the Islamic Empire, Age of Discovery, Enlightenment and stopped around the pre WW1 era. These were more explored in high school and college. American history is so dependent on other nations, how could we not learn about other countries' histories?
  • VisitingBoss
    @BeyBlade1999 its says on this episode no king would be english after william the conquerer, and indeed before this time there was no royale family
    ·
  • Nikanaiko
    Ack, I feel like such a dumb American watching this. The narrator keeps saying phrases like "as we all know," and the truth is I know nothing about this. That's why I looked this documentary up in the first place.
    · 7
  • fahadchughtai
    It's a documentary for UKTV, so it's more for people who are familiar with the basic history. You're an American, so no one's expecting you to know. Let go of your insecurities and just learn.
    · in reply to Nikanaiko (Show the comment)
  • Liam Cunliffe
    why aren't the true english kings in episode one?
    ·
  • BeyBlade1999
    If you mean, because the Normans were french, because, The Normans that came to England's Children would be English. The Normans were on of the most influential people in English history, overweighing the Celts and Boudicca (In my opinion after the 80,000 out of 200,000 men she lost against the Roman army of 10,000)
  • Liam Cunliffe
    Well no one could be more influencial on England's history than the peoples that founded it that had been developing a unique culture on the island for abou 600 years (some even longer) before the Norman Conquest. And no, the Norman hierarchy kept themselves quite separate from the English people so would have no link to England other than perhaps being born there. Certainly no cultural link, and that's really what matters.
  • Daniel Goodman
    Boudicca has nothing to do with English history.
  • ultrabaiter
    This is a good documentary, but I wonder why they use those horrible white on black portraits to show the characters in question?
    They look terrible, as if done by a 13 year old who is failing in art...
    But otherwise, good doc, I will be watching the whole collection eventually I expect. Thanks for posting it up
    ·

   

No comments:

Post a Comment